Title: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 06:40:25 PM OMG... so far on, at least in awesome memorable 1liners, Obama is up 3-1
this is gonna be prime commercial material this weekend Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 06:46:17 PM HOLY *feces* Obama just pimpslapped McCain on EERAK and all McCain can do is tell anecdotes.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 06:56:39 PM MCCAIN JUST BRAGGING ABOUT HELPING THE AFGHAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS IN AFGHANISTAN.
MCCAIN SAYING OBAMA IS WRONG FOR THREATENING PAKISTAN WHILE PALIN ENDORSES ATTACKING RUSSIA OBAMA JUST PUNKED MCCHIMP ON BOMBBOMBBOMB IRAN Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Spanky on September 26, 2008, 06:57:44 PM So how drunk are you at this point?
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 06:59:15 PM very, my friend.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:06:36 PM god i hate this chimpy GOP iran talking point about holocaust pt 2.
if iran hats JEWS why do so many live peacefully ... IN *goshdarn* IRAN!!?>!>!>! wanting to eliminate the nation of Israel is not the same as a genocide, per se. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:09:16 PM McChimp can't even pronounce Ahmadinejad
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:10:46 PM OBAMA JUST OWNED MCCHIMP ON KISSINGER + IRAN.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:13:19 PM OBAMA JUST PIMP SLAPPED MCCAIN ABOUT THE SPAIN/NATO GAFFE.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:14:59 PM MCCAIN CLAIMS ALBRIGHT GOING TO NORTH KOREA ...... wasn't that during CLINTON's TERM?
oops Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:17:28 PM OBAMA PIMPSLAPS MCCHIMP ABOUT THINKING AHMADKJSDFLJTEIOTUWIOETJAD IS NOT TOP DOG IN IRAN. MCCAIN APPEARS ANGRY.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:19:32 PM MCCHIMP CALLING GEORGIA_RUSSIA ALL ON RUSSIA.
[sm_shock] THEN CALLS OBAMA NAIVE. [sm_shock] Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:20:32 PM :o :o
JOHN MCSAME JUST CALLED KIM JONG IL "DEAR LEADER" [sm_shock] [sm_shock] [sm_shock] [sm_shock] Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:22:27 PM MCCAIN JUST SAID RUSSIA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY [sm_shock]
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:27:51 PM MCCAIN SAYS HE IS AGAINST TORTURE AGAIN ?
??? Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:35:10 PM MCCAIN's entire strategy : OBAMA IS YOUNG AND INEXPERIENCED.
repeat x 1000 MCCAIN CLAIMING HE's SERVED VETERANS WELL ? Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:37:47 PM OBAMA WIPED MCCHIMP AROUND TONIGHT, about 10 awesome points to 2.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Spanky on September 26, 2008, 07:39:15 PM So is it over? Is it safe to turn the TV on now?
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 26, 2008, 07:40:27 PM LOL
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: JDerion on September 26, 2008, 07:59:33 PM Objectively, on style points and how I think this plays with the people, I give McBain a slight edge. This was no knockout, and I don't think there was any real blood, but I still think McBain comes out stronger now than he was this afternoon.
And yes, McBain's style was predictable with fill in the blank attacks; Obama doesn't understand ______ and I do because I have been here one million years. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: gleek on September 26, 2008, 08:24:59 PM Objectively, on style points and how I think this plays with the people, I give McBain a slight edge. This was no knockout, and I don't think there was any real blood, but I still think McBain comes out stronger now than he was this afternoon. And yes, McBain's style was predictable with fill in the blank attacks; Obama doesn't understand ______ and I do because I have been here one million years. Sadly, you may be right. The dumbasses in the country will get taken in by all of McFlipper's irrelevant anecdotes (that were so obviously used to change the subject when he got backed into a corner) and his repeated use of "Obama doesn't understand" soundbite. I can't believe Obama didn't just once say "But I do understand, Mr. McCain. Constantly repeating the same thing and over again doesn't suddently make it true." Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 27, 2008, 06:41:10 AM next debate Obama really needs to whip out the Keating 5 card
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 27, 2008, 06:56:18 AM well, I (for once, not the cynic here :o !!) don't see McCain coming out ahead in this debate in any way. This debate(s) is to convince those 5-10% of voters who are still undecideds or the 1-2% who are firmly committed along party lines but can be flipped when actually hearing/seeing these people talk--- certainly not the vast majority of people. And I think to those undecideds-- the "independents", the ones who actually vote both parties every year, etc... McCain came out horrible IMHO. He had very few 'Oh Snap!" moments, he got brutally owned on the economy intro, he got brutally owned on EERAK, and at best, "won" the rest of foreign policy by telling anecdotes and saying "You don't understand" ... while this will certainly make those of us already committed to our votes even more committed (most likely) I doubt this sways the undecideds... McCain is SUPPOSED to be the Foreign Policy expert and at times sounded confused and got belligerent when Obama wasn't caving in. Can you imagine him acting like that with a foreign head of state? Anyways http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/2008Debate1.pdf this made my morning, of course who knows what kind of trust can be put in it... but one can "hope". McCain missed his chance to hit a homerun on this debate, no doubt... and barring a scandal or some other major milestone, this was his last chance to hit a homerun. I think Monday/Tuesday polling will show no change or at best a 1% McCain swing, which will go away as the next debates carry out.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 27, 2008, 08:26:25 AM http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/26/04449/8507/372/610847
couric says kissinger ok with negotiating without pre-conditions. oops for you McCain. Obama is going to run with this ASAP. another source http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/kissinger-backs.html Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 27, 2008, 08:52:45 AM http://news.yahoo.com/s/pew/20080925/ts_pew/46dontknowobamaischristian
scratch what i just said earlier, i'm back to cynical d+G aske. pathetic. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: gleek on September 27, 2008, 10:12:22 AM Instead of simply looking at the voting split along gender and/or economic lines, poll analysts need to seriously start examining the split along the moran/non-moran line.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Seamus on September 27, 2008, 12:02:55 PM Wait 'til the VP's duke it out, that's really when the fun starts.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Clive on September 27, 2008, 05:23:08 PM This debate(s) is to convince those 5-10% of voters who are still undecideds or the 1-2% who are firmly committed along party lines but can be flipped when actually hearing/seeing these people talk--- certainly not the vast majority of people. And I think to those undecideds-- the "independents", the ones who actually vote both parties every year, etc... McCain came out horrible IMHO. FWIW, I haven't followed much of the early campaigning of either party. I'm registered as "Unaffiliated" in NC. I *think* I'm pretty much the demographic these guys are trying to reach in the debates.I watched it and thought it was pretty even. Neither candidate came across as lost, hopelessly out of touch, insincere, etc. McCain seemed more aggressive, which I'm not big on. I especially did not like the repeated "doesn't understand" charge -- I'll decide if he doesn't understand, thanks, and don't talk down to me. Both guys stretched the truth or took things out of context to "punk" the other; that didn't do either one much good in my eyes. This debate wasn't enough to push me firmly in either direction. Then again, I wasn't drunk when I watched it. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 27, 2008, 06:03:14 PM Both guys stretched the truth or took things out of context to "punk" the other; that didn't do either one much good in my eyes. FWIW http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_1.html Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 28, 2008, 06:39:11 AM http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=3904527
find post timestamped 2008-09-28 06:17:26 AM it's tragic that you can't find such beautiful, true, and yet simplistically verbose analysis in the "evil librul MSM" about this critical point. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Seamus on September 28, 2008, 07:15:52 AM I'm kinda in the same demo as Clive. And pardon if someone has said this, but putting all the politicking aside, there is something about McCain not looking Obama in the eye that gets to me, there is also this uneasy smile he has.
Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Blader on September 28, 2008, 07:58:52 AM IMO, McGrommits won handily, by not failing miserably
I now totally understand his campaign strategy. It is to stumble and bumble his way around, then look halfway reasonable at these debates, thereby exceeding everyone's expectations and proving the media pundits hate him and are ruthlessly antagonistic towards Gov. Mother Sarah. This sort of thing solidifies the base the way a blood clots congeal in a cadaver. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: Aske on September 28, 2008, 05:02:07 PM http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/27/politics/fromtheroad/entry4483098.shtml
McChicken calls Obama the exploiter. LMAO Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: gleek on September 28, 2008, 05:24:21 PM LMAO
Quote “John McCain should be careful throwing rocks in his eight glass houses,” said Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor. Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: gleek on September 28, 2008, 07:38:20 PM This debate(s) is to convince those 5-10% of voters who are still undecideds or the 1-2% who are firmly committed along party lines but can be flipped when actually hearing/seeing these people talk--- certainly not the vast majority of people. And I think to those undecideds-- the "independents", the ones who actually vote both parties every year, etc... McCain came out horrible IMHO. FWIW, I haven't followed much of the early campaigning of either party. I'm registered as "Unaffiliated" in NC. I *think* I'm pretty much the demographic these guys are trying to reach in the debates.I watched it and thought it was pretty even. Neither candidate came across as lost, hopelessly out of touch, insincere, etc. McCain seemed more aggressive, which I'm not big on. I especially did not like the repeated "doesn't understand" charge -- I'll decide if he doesn't understand, thanks, and don't talk down to me. Both guys stretched the truth or took things out of context to "punk" the other; that didn't do either one much good in my eyes. This debate wasn't enough to push me firmly in either direction. Then again, I wasn't drunk when I watched it. Clive, there's a huge difference between being a registered as an Independent or Unaffiliated and being "undecided". I'm registered as an Independent, but at this point you'd have to put a gun to my head to force me to vote for McCain. (And I say this because I don't foresee anything happening in the next 40+ days that would be considered a "game changer". If the Repugs are going to release a video of Obama shaking hands with Bin Laden, they would have done it by now.) Out of curiosity, if you truly are undecided, what do you think it would take to swing your vote either way? Title: Re: [Politics/Religion] Debate Post by: MFAWG on September 29, 2008, 10:46:22 AM All Obama had to do was not look stupid, which he did quite well, and not look 'Uppity'.
Now all he has to do is spend the next 5 weeks saying: 'John McCain is a Republican, and look where that got us.' Message discipline is key right now. |