|
Title: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: Aske on November 25, 2006, 09:03:20 AM http://www.slashfood.com/2006/11/16/new-flavors-for-mandms
Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: spacey on November 25, 2006, 09:07:59 AM The day I spend $50 on m&ms is the day I'd better find some counseling for my food addiction.
Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: stroh on November 25, 2006, 09:19:25 AM [sm_disgust]
Stupid uber green, veggie loving, tree huggin' commie libs. ;D Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: stroh on November 25, 2006, 09:20:25 AM Uh, oh. Trouble in paradise. I heard stomping and door slamming upstairs. Gotta go.
Be home later. peace out. Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: spacey on November 25, 2006, 09:20:59 AM :o
Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: stroh on November 25, 2006, 09:32:02 AM LOL
Fashion conflict. Mom and daughter disagreeing on outfit choices. Apparantly the green Capri's and shoes clashed. Who knew? Crisis averted. All clear. ;D Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: Aske on November 25, 2006, 09:35:30 AM LOL Fashion conflict. Mom and daughter disagreeing on outfit choices. Apparantly the green Capri's and shoes clashed. Who knew? Crisis averted. All clear. ;D for now. ;D p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: dystopia on November 25, 2006, 09:48:55 AM LOL Fashion conflict. Mom and daughter disagreeing on outfit choices. Apparantly the green Capri's and shoes clashed. Who knew? Crisis averted. All clear. ;D for now. ;D p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. You mean "kills" in the sense of "slayz", right? I haven't heard of any installation of FF rendering people unable to use IE. Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: Salamander on November 25, 2006, 09:53:18 AM yup.
Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: stroh on November 25, 2006, 05:14:42 PM p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. Ok I'm using it now. Holy stuffing, it even picks up stuff like "in stall". ;) ;D Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: Aske on November 25, 2006, 05:18:22 PM p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. Ok I'm using it now. Holy stuffing, it even picks up stuff like "in stall". ;) ;D now just get used to tabbing, and extension searching ;) Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: worst_golfer_ever on November 25, 2006, 08:43:59 PM http://www.slashfood.com/2006/11/16/new-flavors-for-mandms I don't have a problem with people spending $50 on M&Ms (I figure the $50 package is huge and M&Ms last forever - so it'd be like buying them at a Costco or something). But, I can't imagine doing it for such yucky flavors. [sm_disgust] Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: E-A-G-L-E! on November 26, 2006, 12:40:50 PM p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. Ok I'm using it now. Holy stuffing, it even picks up stuff like "in stall". ;) ;D now just get used to tabbing, and extension searching ;) Sal, don't you have any extensions? [sm_shock] Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: Aske on November 26, 2006, 12:43:34 PM p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. Ok I'm using it now. Holy stuffing, it even picks up stuff like "in stall". ;) ;D now just get used to tabbing, and extension searching ;) Sal, don't you have any extensions? [sm_shock] ? Title: Re: for the candy addicts with $ to burn Post by: E-A-G-L-E! on November 26, 2006, 12:54:26 PM p.s., ff2.0 has inline spellchecker, for words like "Apparantly" that said, your machine looks more than capable of using FF. of course, as I said, any software in stall can always theoretically go wrong. ymmv, but $.02, FF kills IE, and makes your machine both FASTER, SAFER, and EASIER TO USE. Ok I'm using it now. Holy stuffing, it even picks up stuff like "in stall". ;) ;D now just get used to tabbing, and extension searching ;) Sal, don't you have any extensions? [sm_shock] ? Uh, never mind. ::) I guess more of my brain is focused on football than on posting here. Stroh! Get some extensions! |