|
Title: Good news for web developers Post by: gleek on December 20, 2007, 07:09:27 PM Link (http://rogersmj.com/2007/12/20/hell-hath-froze-over-ie-8-passes-acid2-css-test/)
Title: Re: Good news for web developers Post by: stroh on December 20, 2007, 07:26:00 PM [sm_stretch]
Title: Re: Good news for web developers Post by: tdcoly on December 20, 2007, 07:46:19 PM Dumb question: Why are some websites only viewable to IE?
Title: Re: Good news for web developers Post by: Torpedo on December 20, 2007, 07:59:44 PM Dumb question: Why are some websites only viewable to IE? Some people are not smart enough to code for multiple browsers. ;) Title: Re: Good news for web developers Post by: Uisce Beatha on December 21, 2007, 07:50:05 AM Dumb question: Why are some websites only viewable to IE? Some designers want to take advantage of IE-only extensions. It's lazy, weak and in some cases (i.e. govt. sites) against the law or bending it severely. I won't spend two minutes trying to tweak my browser(s) to work with a site that fails or is limited in functionality due to my environment. I just walk away. (http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401)(http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss) [sm_headbang] Title: Re: Good news for web developers Post by: tdcoly on December 21, 2007, 07:39:44 PM Dumb question: Why are some websites only viewable to IE? Some designers want to take advantage of IE-only extensions. It's lazy, weak and in some cases (i.e. govt. sites) against the law or bending it severely. I won't spend two minutes trying to tweak my browser(s) to work with a site that fails or is limited in functionality due to my environment. I just walk away. (http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401)(http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss) [sm_headbang] One of many reasons (crappy service, surly staff, slow play are others) I won't play our local muni is their website is accessible in IE. I will not install IE on my Mac. [sm_devil] |