|
Title: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on May 30, 2010, 11:14:48 AM So I check out the starting grid, and I see this half-Greek, half-Latin-sounding "sun" dude sitting in the pole position. I looked him up on Wikipedia, and I find out that he's sort of a big deal: 3-time 500 winner, DWTS, so on and so forth. I check out his age, and the dude is only 35. So I'm thinking: "*fudge*, this dude could win this 4th Indy 500 today, and he'd have a really good shot at being first-ever 5-time winner. Hell, I'd settle for just being Mr. Ashley Judd."
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on May 30, 2010, 11:18:05 AM Oh, I forgot this:
(http://cdn2.maxim.com/maxim/files/2005/06/08/danica-mckellar/danica_McKellar_l7.jpg) Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: MFAWG on May 30, 2010, 11:37:11 AM It''s always fun to watch an interview with Dario, because the accent is sort of misplaced, shall we say?
This thing is UGLY so far. Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: stroh on May 30, 2010, 11:41:12 AM Oh, I forgot this: (http://cdn2.maxim.com/maxim/files/2005/06/08/danica-mckellar/danica_McKellar_l7.jpg) LMAO! [sm_thumbsup2] [sm_thumbsup2] Well WTF? I can't find it. I go to ABC, it says Indy, but it's showing the same dumb ass lame informercial that's on NBC. What the hell? Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: stroh on May 30, 2010, 11:44:26 AM Found it.
Weird. Apparently I have two ABC's. Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: geo1 on May 30, 2010, 11:52:22 AM Found it. Weird. Apparently I have two ABC's. Probably more other channels too. You get Palm Springs and LA stations. Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: stroh on May 30, 2010, 11:57:12 AM Ah. That makes sense.
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: stroh on May 30, 2010, 12:43:20 PM Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on May 30, 2010, 01:51:39 PM Well, what do you know? Mr. Ashley Judd wins it. And Ms. Patrick finishes Top 5 again.
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: MFAWG on May 30, 2010, 03:06:50 PM Well, what do you know? Mr. Ashley Judd wins it. And Ms. Patrick finishes Top 5 again. Give that one to her race strategist/engineer. Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: Aske on October 25, 2011, 08:34:27 PM [*keyword spam removed*]
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: MFAWG on October 25, 2011, 09:00:08 PM WTFLOLOLOL!
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: MFAWG on October 25, 2011, 09:03:10 PM Here's a good one:
Dan Wheldon Decap pic. (Yeah, they're supposedly out there. I'll pass. I got the message from the peeled away helmet and missing roll bar.) Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: Aske on October 26, 2011, 09:13:52 AM WTFLOLOLOL! i dunno, LOL. just felt bored and nostalgic for that thread from a few years ago Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: dystopia on October 26, 2011, 04:33:57 PM Damn, those posts are going to get us booted from Google for keyword stuffing (as well as the "adult" penalty).
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66358 Quote "Keyword stuffing" refers to the practice of loading a webpage with keywords in an attempt to manipulate a site's ranking in Google's search results. Filling pages with keywords results in a negative user experience, and can harm your site's ranking. Focus on creating useful, information-rich content that uses keywords appropriately and in context. To fix this problem, review your site for misused keywords. Typically, these will be lists or paragraphs of keywords, often randomly repeated. Check carefully, because keywords can often be in the form of hidden text, or they can be hidden in title tags or alt attributes. Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: Aske on October 26, 2011, 05:02:38 PM oh crap, sorry man!
I had no idea. :sad3: Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on October 26, 2011, 06:27:05 PM How does Google even figure out if you're keyword stuffing?
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: MFAWG on October 26, 2011, 06:30:20 PM I'm no expert, but I'd say that would have been hard to miss given the traffic around here.
One keyword a week, and then BAM 300 in less than a minute, LOL! Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on October 26, 2011, 06:37:56 PM What was the keyword? (spell it backwards)
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: Aske on October 26, 2011, 06:44:41 PM what wasn't a keyword?
lol Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on October 26, 2011, 06:47:07 PM what wasn't a keyword? lol What was the specific keyword that dys had to remove? Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: Aske on October 26, 2011, 06:59:48 PM tough call
it was a ridiculous post LOL probably b0ner meds jim nabors priest m0lestation 4nal p0rn set off the red flag Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: gleek on October 26, 2011, 07:09:00 PM LOL @ priest
Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: Aske on October 26, 2011, 08:12:24 PM oh, there was a lot more than that
lol 8) Title: Re: Stupid Indy observation for 2010 Post by: dystopia on October 27, 2011, 01:29:25 PM No biggie.
Actually, none of the words stood out to me individually. It was more about the lines and lines of random adult words like this: (http://www.spanishseo.org/files/img/2008/07/google-groups-3.jpg) A ban from Google is pretty severe. There's no warning and you're pretty much screwed. Avoiding Keyword Stuffing Ban http://www.seoresearcher.com/average-keyword-saturation-google-msn-yahoo.htm |