|
Title: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: Aske on April 23, 2007, 10:31:21 AM http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=196144
Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: Uisce Beatha on April 23, 2007, 10:34:26 AM Add it to the list (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Choking+the+chicken).
Welcome back... slacker. Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: Spanky on April 23, 2007, 10:56:16 AM Wonder if they left a tip for the maid.
Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: stegerman on April 23, 2007, 11:38:47 AM Well I guess there refusal to pay because they didn't want anyone to find out what they had been doing....well....let's just say, not so much.
Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: dystopia on April 23, 2007, 12:07:31 PM Quote Two men were arrested early yesterday morning at the Radisson Hotel in Park Square when they couldn’t square the $600 tab for a smut-film bender they’d allegedly been on since checking into their room on Saturday. yikes! a "smut-film bender"?!! That doesn't sounds good. lol... Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: worst_golfer_ever on April 23, 2007, 02:07:20 PM $600??!? I wouldn't pay that, either -- what a rip-off!
(back of the envelope calculation - checkin Saturday @3pm, arrested Sunday @9am is 18 hours. At ~2hrs/movie, that's 9 movies, make it an even 10 for easy calculations. That's $60/movie!) Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: stegerman on April 23, 2007, 02:34:33 PM $600??!? I wouldn't pay that, either -- what a rip-off! (back of the envelope calculation - checkin Saturday @3pm, arrested Sunday @9am is 18 hours. At ~2hrs/movie, that's 9 movies, make it an even 10 for easy calculations. That's $60/movie!) I think the $600 includes the room. Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: worst_golfer_ever on April 23, 2007, 04:58:43 PM Ah! OK. That's better.
(No, wait, not really. Don't most hotels, particularly the pricey ones, require a credit card when you check in, if not when you make the reservation? This whole thing is sounding fishy.) Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: TFT on April 23, 2007, 05:01:45 PM "In February, a 56-year-old Connecticut man was arrested on charges of assault and battery on a police officer, larceny over $250 and resisting arrest after he allegedly refused to pay a $6,205 bill at the Centerfolds strip club in Chinatown police attributed to multiple lap dances."
Multiple lap dances, you don't say.... Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: stroh on April 23, 2007, 05:09:55 PM Why is it "defrauding"? Wouldn't that mean you're making an honest transaction?
"I was gonna fraud you by not paying my bill, but I figured that wasn't right, so to make up for it, I will defraud you, by paying in full, with a little extra, for you and the misses." ;) Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: Clive on April 23, 2007, 05:10:51 PM And innkeepers will continue to be deflowered like this until pr0n is liberated and once again free for all Americans.
Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: stegerman on April 24, 2007, 11:48:35 AM And innkeepers will continue to be deflowered like this until pr0n is liberated and once again free for all Americans. pröñ 2.0 Title: Re: "defrauding the inkeeper" Post by: stegerman on April 24, 2007, 12:15:59 PM Why is it "defrauding"? Wouldn't that mean you're making an honest transaction? "I was gonna fraud you by not paying my bill, but I figured that wasn't right, so to make up for it, I will defraud you, by paying in full, with a little extra, for you and the misses." ;) Maybe he meant "defrocking" the innkeeper. |