|
Title: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Teed on June 24, 2008, 11:37:20 AM Quote "Well, I think that they sit there and they say that they want to make a difference and it's awful that all these kids are getting pregnant, but they don't want to do anything to help them. They won't put contraceptives in the nurse's office or anything and no kid wants to go into the store and buy them, or like, ask them mom to help them get birth control. Like, it's embarrassing. So, instead of, like, making them make the decision not to use any of them, they should be giving them out in the nurse's office so you can get it anonymously," Oliver said. http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/16692720/detail.html Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Aske on June 24, 2008, 11:44:10 AM Quote "Well, I think that they sit there and they say that they want to make a difference and it's awful that all these kids are getting pregnant, but they don't want to do anything to help them. They won't put contraceptives in the nurse's office or anything and no kid wants to go into the store and buy them, or like, ask them mom to help them get birth control. Like, it's embarrassing. So, instead of, like, making them make the decision not to use any of them, they should be giving them out in the nurse's office so you can get it anonymously," Oliver said. http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/16692720/detail.html at least ms. south carolina was smart enough not to get knocked up. lol Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Fuzzy on June 24, 2008, 11:47:07 AM Quote Oliver appeared on the morning news program with her baby's father, Andrew Psalidas, 20, who said he thinks the spike in teen pregnancies at the high school, which may be as many as 17 this year, is just a coincidence. "I would just guess to say that girls are just ... getting unlucky, maybe," he said. The couple said they were not planning to have a child. "Lindsey was on birth control. She was very careful with it, you know, because, obviously, we, at 17 and 20, we're not ready for a kid. But we're trying a lot harder now to get ready, that's for sure," Psalidas said. Yes. They are all just.....unlucky. Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Aske on June 24, 2008, 11:52:31 AM Yes. They are all just.....unlucky. not satire anymore. ~1:05 Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Fuzzy on June 24, 2008, 12:01:47 PM Yes. They are all just.....unlucky. not satire anymore. ~1:05 ;) I used to laugh at "Idiocracy" and it's presentation of evolution. More and more I'm wondering if it will turn out to be a Nostradamus-like documentary. Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: spacey on June 24, 2008, 12:14:09 PM Humans desperately need a predator besides themselves.
Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: gleek on June 24, 2008, 09:16:21 PM "I gonna *fudge* all y'all!"
Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: stroh on June 25, 2008, 05:46:24 AM Quote The couple said they were not planning to have a child. That would mean that it is just a 20 y/o banging a 17 y/o. No law against that? Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Aske on June 25, 2008, 08:21:53 AM Quote The couple said they were not planning to have a child. That would mean that it is just a 20 y/o banging a 17 y/o. No law against that? i think it depends on the state Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Clive on June 25, 2008, 10:08:13 AM Quote Chapter 265: Section 23. Rape and abuse of child Google is suffering from low blood sugar -- I can't find anything construing "of chaste life" WRT to this MA law. (And it's outside the scope of my legal research databases.) In general and in other references, though, it means "virgin". So if your 17-year-old girlfriend is experienced, I think you're golden in MA.Whoever unlawfully has ****ual intercourse or unnatural ****ual intercourse, and abuses a child under sixteen years of age shall, for the first offense, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for life or for any term of years, or, except as otherwise provided, for any term in a jail or house of correction, and for the second or subsequent offense by imprisonment in the state prison for life or for any term of years, but not less than five years; provided, however, that a prosecution commenced under the provisions of this section shall not be placed on file or continued without a finding. Chapter 272: Section 4. Inducing person under eighteen to have ****ual intercourse Whoever induces any person under 18 years of age of chaste life to have unlawful ****ual intercourse shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years or in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by both such fine and imprisonment. Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Aske on June 25, 2008, 10:12:09 AM but how can the 'under 18' have had ****ual intercourse if it's a crime for anyone to have **** with them to begin with
??? freakin legalese Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Clive on June 25, 2008, 10:21:32 AM She could have been unlawfully molested. She could have moved to MA from another state where the age of consent is 16. Her surname could be Spears. Or Winehouse.
Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: gleek on June 25, 2008, 01:22:52 PM Assuming that the troll...I mean "young woman" had never lived in another state nor had been raped/abused/etc. How in the hell do they prove that you were the first one to bang her?
Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Clive on June 25, 2008, 01:34:52 PM You assert that her sundae had no fruit garnish on top. Up to her to assert otherwise.
Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: stegerman on June 25, 2008, 01:44:29 PM Humans desperately need a predator besides themselves. halabercheney Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Fuzzy on June 25, 2008, 02:26:44 PM You assert that her sundae had no fruit garnish on top. Up to her to assert otherwise. (http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c189/FuzzyPhotos/warrant-cherryPie.jpg) Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: twoiron on June 25, 2008, 04:12:25 PM You assert that her sundae had no fruit garnish on top. Up to her to assert otherwise. (http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c189/FuzzyPhotos/warrant-cherryPie.jpg) Is that meant to be an obscure reference to Hair Pie?? Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: Aske on June 25, 2008, 04:15:22 PM quite possibly THE worst band of all time.
Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: twoiron on June 25, 2008, 04:24:41 PM quite possibly THE worst band of all time. I reckon the Proclaimers and/or Bros would be right up there Title: Re: Ms.Teen.South.Carolina.Surrenders Post by: stroh on June 25, 2008, 05:03:00 PM |