|
Title: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Aske on December 23, 2008, 10:11:49 AM http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aQ7HBEgYCzUE&refer=home
Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Spanky on December 23, 2008, 10:14:59 AM Not to be all rude and *feces* but could it be that maybe houses weren't really worth what they were selling for the past several years?
Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Aske on December 23, 2008, 10:17:05 AM Not to be all rude and *feces* but could it be that maybe houses weren't really worth what they were selling for the past several years? No doubt. Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Clive on December 23, 2008, 10:19:45 AM Spanky, does it matter?
Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Spanky on December 23, 2008, 10:26:37 AM Guess not.
Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Spartan on December 23, 2008, 10:38:54 AM According to Zillow, that's what my house is down since last year. Fortunately I bought it 24 years ago, so we're no where near being upside down on it.
Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Clive on December 23, 2008, 10:49:09 AM Erratic through 2008, but overall +4.4%. I'm
Title: Re: [ECON D+G] -13% Post by: Spanky on December 23, 2008, 11:34:23 AM Actually our house is up 15% from when we bought it. But then I felt it was underpriced when we did.
|