|
Title: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: MFAWG on August 30, 2007, 09:54:59 AM http://www.slate.com/id/2173033/ Quote Bathroom **** FAQ Cruising signals, legal issues, and Larry Craig's "wide stance." By Christopher Beam Is tapping your foot really code for public ****? Yes. The signal has been around for decades in the United States and Europe. Generally, one person initiates contact by tapping his foot in a way that's visible beneath the stall divider. If the second person responds with a similar tap, the initiator moves his foot closer to the other person's stall. If the other person makes a similar move, the first will inch closer yet again. The pair usually goes through the whole process a few times, just to confirm that the signals aren't an accident. Next, one of the men will slide his hand under the divider. This usually means he's inviting the other person to present himself, as if to say, "Show me what you got." The partner can respond by kneeling on the floor and presenting his penis or rear end underneath the divider. Or he can swipe his own hand under the divider, as if to say, "You go first." Some married men make a point of displaying their wedding band (like Sen. Craig allegedly did) to make themselves more alluring. Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Uisce Beatha on August 30, 2007, 10:06:13 AM What does that have to do with chicken curry?
Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: gleek on August 30, 2007, 10:30:01 AM Why isn't there a "signal" that a man could use on a woman that's as effective as this?
Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: dystopia on August 30, 2007, 10:37:45 AM Why isn't there a "signal" that a man could use on a woman that's as effective as this? (http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/scorecard/12/14/best.quotes/p1_palmeiro.jpg)(http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f60/golfstroh/point.jpg) Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Aske on August 30, 2007, 10:55:05 AM Why isn't there a "signal" that a man could use on a woman that's as effective as this? (http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f60/golfstroh/point.jpg)[sm_laughatyou] :isaac: Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: birdymaker on August 30, 2007, 11:02:29 AM Why isn't there a "signal" that a man could use on a woman that's as effective as this? (http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/scorecard/12/14/best.quotes/p1_palmeiro.jpg)(http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f60/golfstroh/point.jpg) ;D karma +1 Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Seamus on August 30, 2007, 11:09:05 AM Why isn't there a "signal" that a man could use on a woman that's as effective as this? (http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/scorecard/12/14/best.quotes/p1_palmeiro.jpg)(http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f60/golfstroh/point.jpg) Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Walfredo on August 30, 2007, 11:22:48 AM Why isn't there a "signal" that a man could use on a woman that's as effective as this? (http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f60/golfstroh/point.jpg)[sm_laughatyou] :isaac: Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: birdymaker on August 30, 2007, 11:24:09 AM never post pictures of yourself on teh internets. people save that *feces* forever. [sm_devil]
Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: gleek on August 30, 2007, 12:06:35 PM never post pictures of yourself on teh internets. people save that *feces* forever. [sm_devil] And that goes twice for video. :D Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: birdymaker on August 31, 2007, 04:48:50 PM bump for stroh. [sm_stir]
Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Uisce Beatha on August 31, 2007, 05:00:21 PM bump for stroh. [sm_stir] Good idea. Maybe he can figure out why this is "for Uisce". ??? Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Seamus on August 31, 2007, 05:18:16 PM bump for stroh. [sm_stir] Good idea. Maybe he can figure out why this is "for Uisce". ???Psssst. tap tap tap? (no response) TAP TAP TAP? Know what I mean Vern? Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Aske on August 31, 2007, 05:19:34 PM Know what I mean Vern? interestingly enough I only learned today that guy has been dead for like 6 years [sm_shock] Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: Uisce Beatha on August 31, 2007, 05:23:21 PM bump for stroh. [sm_stir] Good idea. Maybe he can figure out why this is "for Uisce". ???Psssst. tap tap tap? (no response) TAP TAP TAP? Know what I mean Vern? Ahhhh, I see. :o JM&J, how do I get out of this one? Title: Re: For Uisce (Possibly NSFW or EAGLE.) Post by: stroh on August 31, 2007, 05:23:48 PM bump for stroh. [sm_stir] Good idea. Maybe he can figure out why this is "for Uisce". ??? LOL! I'm as lost as my Breath of Life brother......other than LMAO the pic.s [sm_laughing] |