|
Title: Pac-10 Post by: gleek on December 30, 2008, 10:21:26 PM 3-0 so far. [sm_shock]
Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: Aske on December 31, 2008, 08:04:19 AM the mighty wannstedts will send you back to reality this afternoon.
well not really. just lesean mccoy. Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: Jules on December 31, 2008, 01:57:02 PM :sleep: :sleep: :sleep:
Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: Aske on December 31, 2008, 02:45:17 PM FIRE DAVE WANN*feces*!
Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: dystopia on December 31, 2008, 03:39:17 PM :sleep: :sleep: :sleep: Good call. [sm_thumbsup2] I watched the 4th quarter and that game was terrible. [sm_disgust] Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: gleek on December 31, 2008, 06:20:00 PM LMAO (http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=283660221&confId=80)
879 yards... ...of punting. Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: MFAWG on January 01, 2009, 03:34:12 PM Could go to 5 and 0.
Of course, any conference that has the word 'Big' in it automatically has a stronger schedule... ::) Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: Blader on January 02, 2009, 08:57:40 AM Look who they played. The only shocker was Oregon's win over OSU. Otherwise, the Pac10 had about the easiest set of match ups.
My God! We had to turn off the volume last night on Herby and Brenty. My ears started bleeding. Those two just do not STFU. Ever. Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: Seamus on January 03, 2009, 12:27:47 PM Look who they played. The only shocker was Oregon's win over OSU. Otherwise, the Pac10 had about the easiest set of match ups. I just gotta chime in and call BS on this one. If any of us left coasters would have said the pac 10 will go 5 and 0 this bowl season most of you would have called us crack addicts. 'specially some cat on the right coast with a goatee and a penchant for death metal and nonsensical charts.Just sayin'. Title: Re: Pac-10 Post by: Uisce Beatha on January 04, 2009, 07:57:20 AM 6-2. [sm_devil]
|