|
Title: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Aske on April 20, 2010, 04:58:55 PM http://static.nfl.com/static/content/schedule-release-xml/2010/2010_schedules.pdf
Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Spanky on April 20, 2010, 06:02:28 PM Not sure the Cowboys will do much better this year.
What's your take on the Big Ben trade rumors? Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: stroh on April 20, 2010, 08:14:44 PM I don't see a loss on the schedule.
Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Aske on April 20, 2010, 08:15:48 PM Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: stroh on April 20, 2010, 08:20:20 PM LOL I was gonna throw up 19-0. But, You know. Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Teed on April 21, 2010, 05:59:07 AM Hopefully 3-1.
Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Teed on April 21, 2010, 08:04:10 AM 4-6 game suspension.
Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Teed on April 21, 2010, 10:47:23 AM Steelers 2-4 start w/ Ben out.
Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Spanky on April 21, 2010, 02:41:11 PM http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/pit/roster
LOL Yahoo doesn't even have Ben on the roster. Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: stroh on April 21, 2010, 08:06:24 PM 4-6 game suspension. I haven't been online enough to read any articles. But my first response would be: "For something the DA said there wasn't enough evidence to press charges?" Is there more I'm missing? Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: Aske on April 21, 2010, 08:23:44 PM 4-6 game suspension. I haven't been online enough to read any articles. But my first response would be: "For something the DA said there wasn't enough evidence to press charges?" Is there more I'm missing? pattern of conduct wait till teams start paying bimbos to accuse Brady or manning. Lol Title: Re: 2010 Steelers open 1-3 Post by: stroh on April 21, 2010, 08:36:05 PM 4-6 game suspension. I haven't been online enough to read any articles. But my first response would be: "For something the DA said there wasn't enough evidence to press charges?" Is there more I'm missing? pattern of conduct wait till teams start paying bimbos to accuse Brady or manning. Lol ;D I can see the pattern of conduct thing to a point. Goodell wants to put the hammer down and he's done that, but then *fudge*s like McKinney need to be gone completely. And I guess my point was kind of what you alluded too. One is a civil suit, and the other is (well, what if it is some broad is just trying to cash in?) Roflbuger has to "toe the line of excellence" because he is targeted? Like I said I haven't read enough (I.J.H.) either way but it seems a little unfair at this point. Maybe he is just a p.o.s. like some of the others and Rooney wants him gone. Is it still Rooney? So I can see him being shopped. |