|
Title: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: Aske on January 05, 2009, 06:53:34 PM [sm_shock]
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: birdymaker on January 05, 2009, 06:55:21 PM huh? you mean patriots? ???
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: Aske on January 05, 2009, 07:04:35 PM http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-patriots-cassel&prov=ap&type=lgns
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: birdymaker on January 05, 2009, 07:12:11 PM brady's toast. ;)
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: Aske on January 05, 2009, 07:47:40 PM [sm_shock]
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: APTech on January 06, 2009, 06:09:19 AM The franchise tag doesn't mean that he couldn't be traded for. Jared Allen was franchised by KC when the Vikes traded for him. It only means that he can't go on the market as an unrestricted free agent.
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: stroh on January 06, 2009, 08:07:17 AM We'll pay it. We got 20 million in cap space. Get him here now.
Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: Aske on January 06, 2009, 08:51:05 AM The franchise tag doesn't mean that he couldn't be traded for. Jared Allen was franchised by KC when the Vikes traded for him. It only means that he can't go on the market as an unrestricted free agent. True. The only trades the Vikes could offer though would be AF and a couple of draft picks though, or a series of yearly 1st rounders. Not even sure the Pats would want the chronic fumbler though [sm_devil] ;D Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: stroh on January 06, 2009, 08:55:28 AM The franchise tag doesn't mean that he couldn't be traded for. Jared Allen was franchised by KC when the Vikes traded for him. It only means that he can't go on the market as an unrestricted free agent. True. The only trades the Vikes could offer though would be AF and a couple of draft picks though, or a series of yearly 1st rounders. Not even sure the Pats would want the chronic fumbler though [sm_devil] ;D LOL AF. [sm_laughing] 1st and 3rd this year. Plus the salary we would have to pay him as a franchise quarterback. I'll have Ziggy send the jet out. Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: Aske on January 06, 2009, 09:00:28 AM The franchise tag doesn't mean that he couldn't be traded for. Jared Allen was franchised by KC when the Vikes traded for him. It only means that he can't go on the market as an unrestricted free agent. True. The only trades the Vikes could offer though would be AF and a couple of draft picks though, or a series of yearly 1st rounders. Not even sure the Pats would want the chronic fumbler though [sm_devil] ;D LOL AF. [sm_laughing] 1st and 3rd this year. Plus the salary we would have to pay him as a franchise quarterback. I'll have Ziggy send the jet out. C Taylor isn't that bad. Find your change of pace back in the 2nd round. [sm_devil] Title: Re: No Cassell for the Vikes. Post by: stroh on January 06, 2009, 09:10:20 AM C Taylor isn't that bad. Find your change of pace back in the 2nd round. [sm_devil] Agreed. In fact it may be difficult to keep him around. I'm sure a lot of teams would be shopping him as a number 1. |