|
Title: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: Aske on August 26, 2008, 08:34:07 AM http://www.mirfieldreporter.co.uk/news/39Girls-touched-me-then-fleeced.4416050.jp
Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: gleek on August 26, 2008, 07:12:07 PM If he got some good groping out of it, I'm sure it was worth the £30.
Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: Jules on August 26, 2008, 09:24:21 PM That is the kind of trouble you get into when you think with your *8==>* and not your brain. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: gleek on August 26, 2008, 09:26:12 PM That is the kind of trouble you get into when you think with your *8==>* and not your brain. ;D ;D ;D Is there a difference? Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: Jules on August 26, 2008, 09:35:30 PM Not to you fella's there isn"t. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: stroh on August 27, 2008, 06:02:46 AM If he got some good groping out of it, I'm sure it was worth the £30. That was kinda my take on it. He would have spent that money any way for a good squeezing. Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: Uisce Beatha on August 27, 2008, 07:38:36 PM Why would you agree to be interviewed for this story? Let's see, pay $80 to be ridiculed for life...???
Dumas. Title: Re: you mean it wasn't because he's a stud? Post by: gleek on August 27, 2008, 08:13:28 PM tMe3WDmxBEI.
|