|
Title: the nfl's highest paid (assumedly?) writer can't even check simple facts. Post by: Aske on October 26, 2009, 09:49:24 AM http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-o=2&statisticPositionCategory=QUARTERBACK&tabSeq=1&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=PASSING_COMPLETION_PERCENTAGE&d-447263-n=1
i HATE that clowns of this level end up with ridiculous jobs. ignore that his opinions are typically bad and proven out. just focus on the fact that as a paid WRITER he makes crisco-level mistakes. this one is beyond staggeringly bad... http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/10/25/mmqb/2.html Quote "Actually I wasn't.'' -- Oakland quarterback JaMarcus Russell, responding to coach Tom Cable saying he was "out of sorts'' during the 38-0 loss to the Jets Sunday. If that performance isn't "out of sorts,'' kid, I'd like to see a performance that is. Russell was 6-of-11 with no touchdowns and two interceptions. After seven games, he's completing a league-low 46.3-percent of his throws. Last time I checked, 43.8 % is lower than 46.3%. Then again, my eyes aren't cloudy after weeping all night as my favorite team's arch-rival moved on to the World Series... Title: Re: the nfl's highest paid (assumedly?) writer can't even check simple facts. Post by: Aske on October 26, 2009, 05:25:36 PM :sad3:
Title: Re: the nfl's highest paid (assumedly?) writer can't even check simple facts. Post by: stroh on October 26, 2009, 05:34:18 PM I was so angry all day just on the quotes you posted, I couldn't even click the links. Now after a few beers I'm even more livid with that assclown.
Hate! Title: Re: the nfl's highest paid (assumedly?) writer can't even check simple facts. Post by: Aske on November 02, 2009, 06:09:59 AM http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/11/01/mmqb.week.8/2.html
LMAO @ the failed logic connection between #1, 11 |