|
Title: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Aske on June 28, 2007, 04:09:42 PM http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19468182/
Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Uisce Beatha on June 28, 2007, 04:15:04 PM Wrasslin' is bad for you.
Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Aske on June 28, 2007, 04:15:57 PM Wrasslin' is bad for you. :'(Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Seamus on June 28, 2007, 04:29:03 PM Did you watch the Mcmahon video on that link?
WWE wellness plan? :D I haven't seen that much back peddling since Olly North was on the stand. Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: BFBoy on June 28, 2007, 06:18:59 PM It would be ironic if it was found that he killed himself because Vince McMahon was blown up the week before [sm_shock]
Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: tdcoly on June 28, 2007, 07:00:06 PM I haven't seen that much back peddling since Olly North was on the stand. Lance Armstrong in reverse! Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: danny cool on October 10, 2007, 07:48:11 AM can some1 explain how it gets crepier
:) :) :) Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Aske on October 10, 2007, 08:01:12 AM the date it was originally posted corresponds to when the 1st news story broke abvout the wikipedia entry describing his wife's death before the police revealed it.
Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Walfredo on October 10, 2007, 08:07:10 AM can some1 explain how it gets crepier Welcome danny cool [sm_beertoast]:) :) :) Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: gleek on October 10, 2007, 08:24:25 AM the date it was originally posted corresponds to when the 1st news story broke abvout the wikipedia entry describing his wife's death before the police revealed it. ??? Explain it to me like I'm stroh after 5 pm. Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: spacey on October 10, 2007, 08:28:31 AM the date it was originally posted corresponds to when the 1st news story broke abvout the wikipedia entry describing his wife's death before the police revealed it. ??? Explain it to me like I'm stroh after 5 pm. Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Aske on October 10, 2007, 08:29:07 AM pretty much
Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: gleek on October 10, 2007, 08:41:59 AM Ah, "date it was originally posted" is a reference to YOUR post--not when the news story was "posted". Pronoun confusion.
Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: Aske on October 10, 2007, 08:50:40 AM Ah, "date it was originally posted" is a reference to YOUR post--not when the news story was "posted". Pronoun confusion. which do you hate more: ambiguous antecedant or dangling participle ? Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: stroh on October 10, 2007, 09:01:19 AM the date it was originally posted corresponds to when the 1st news story broke abvout the wikipedia entry describing his wife's death before the police revealed it. ??? Explain it to me like I'm stroh after 5 pm. [sm_laughing] [sm_rolling] Title: Re: benoit case gets creepier! wtf Post by: gleek on October 10, 2007, 09:14:19 AM Ah, "date it was originally posted" is a reference to YOUR post--not when the news story was "posted". Pronoun confusion. which do you hate more: ambiguous antecedant or dangling participle ? As a pretty innocuous grammar violation, I'm willing to let it pass. |