Title: Well, at least they don't have a Guantanamo [Politics/Religion sorta] Post by: Uisce Beatha on August 27, 2007, 09:22:56 AM http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6965412.stm
Otherwise they'd be in trouble with Amnesty Intl., HRW, etc. In all seriousness, WTF is wrong with people? Title: Re: Well, at least they don't have a Guantanamo [Politics/Religion sorta] Post by: Aske on August 27, 2007, 09:42:43 AM same thing that was wrong with people in europe 600 years ago.
:) Title: Re: Well, at least they don't have a Guantanamo [Politics/Religion sorta] Post by: spacey on August 27, 2007, 09:44:36 AM Perhaps we can throw this at ButchC, I'm sure he's got a solution.
Title: Re: Well, at least they don't have a Guantanamo [Politics/Religion sorta] Post by: Uisce Beatha on August 27, 2007, 09:51:35 AM same thing that was wrong with people in europe 600 years ago. :) So, regarding Oceania, are they ahead of or behind schedule. [sm_devil] Title: Re: Well, at least they don't have a Guantanamo [Politics/Religion sorta] Post by: birdymaker on August 27, 2007, 10:03:03 AM same thing that was wrong with people in europe 600 years ago. :) so, ship them of to australia instead? [sm_devil] |