|
Title: Run for the Roses Post by: Aske on May 05, 2007, 02:04:29 PM doesnt seem to be too hyped this year after the disaster last year with Barbaro
[sm_shock] Title: Re: Run for the Roses Post by: spacey on May 05, 2007, 02:05:50 PM Nearly all of the talk I've heard of it has been Barbaro related.
Title: Re: Run for the Roses Post by: Fuzzy on May 05, 2007, 02:20:19 PM I'm guessing the Barbaro stuff will be in overdrive for the Preakness where he broke the leg.
Title: Re: Run for the Roses Post by: Aske on May 05, 2007, 02:24:30 PM I'm guessing the Barbaro stuff will be in overdrive for the Preakness where he broke the leg. agreed, just can't remember a year with LESS advertising for the derby Title: Re: Run for the Roses Post by: Fuzzy on May 05, 2007, 02:31:03 PM I'm guessing the Barbaro stuff will be in overdrive for the Preakness where he broke the leg. agreed, just can't remember a year with LESS advertising for the derby True. It did seem to sneak up this year. I really thought they'd be milking the Barbaro angle for all its worth. Title: Re: Run for the Roses Post by: Aske on May 05, 2007, 03:19:24 PM wow from 19th to 1st in the last 3/4 mile :o
Title: Re: Run for the Roses Post by: BobA on May 05, 2007, 04:00:58 PM Seemed like he knew he had a lot of horse under him and he let the early speed fight it out. I think he rode a smart race but he was gambling on getting through all that traffic.
|