|
Title: weak. Post by: Aske on March 19, 2008, 10:33:59 AM http://www.tampabay.com/news/humaninterest/article423277.ece
oh, btw. 4.8? how is that possible. Title: Re: weak. Post by: stroh on March 19, 2008, 10:36:10 AM (http://www.tampabay.com/multimedia/archive/00014/b4s_mohawk031908a_14672d.jpeg)
Wonder if he has an obsession for Pat Sajak. Title: Re: weak. Post by: Uisce Beatha on March 19, 2008, 10:46:20 AM oh, btw. 4.8? how is that possible. 5.0 system. Heard of it but it's not in play around here AFAIK. Title: Re: weak. Post by: Walfredo on March 19, 2008, 10:57:25 AM oh, btw. 4.8? how is that possible. 5.0 system. Heard of it but it's not in play around here AFAIK. Title: Re: weak. Post by: Aske on March 19, 2008, 11:04:19 AM oh, btw. 4.8? how is that possible. 5.0 system. Heard of it but it's not in play around here AFAIK. wow, we had some bonuses for AP but there were limits on availability as well as overall course requirements ... so there was no way anyone could mathematically have gone higher than a 4.4 or so without taking a 5th year of courses. time change I guess. Title: Re: weak. Post by: stroh on March 19, 2008, 11:10:20 AM not.an.issue.for.me.
Title: Re: weak. Post by: spacey on March 19, 2008, 11:21:59 AM oh, btw. 4.8? how is that possible. Title: Re: weak. Post by: Clive on March 19, 2008, 01:23:14 PM (http://kevinremde.members.winisp.net/images/Nigel_20Tufnel_thumb.jpg)
My high school GPA went to 11. Title: Re: weak. Post by: birdymaker on March 19, 2008, 02:05:06 PM (http://kevinremde.members.winisp.net/images/Nigel_20Tufnel_thumb.jpg) My high school GPA went to .11 Title: Re: weak. Post by: Spanky on March 19, 2008, 07:25:56 PM not.an.issue.for.me. LOLYou and I made fun of those people and stole their girlfriends. |