|
Title: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: birdymaker on September 18, 2007, 06:50:30 PM playing the race card. [sm_anon]
if you are the quarterback of the team a lot of people are picking to represent your conference in the superbowl, and you start the season 0-2, just blame it on prejudice. ;) http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7239556]sorry azz excuse Quote In an interview on HBO's "Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel" to be broadcast Tuesday, McNabb said black quarterbacks "have to do a little bit extra" because there are relatively few of them, adding "people didn't want us to play this position." McNabb said if he passes for 300 yards and his team wins by a touchdown, critics will say, "Oh, he could have made this throw here. We would have scored more points if he would have done this." Quote ORIGINAL: professor Quote ORIGINAL: spuzz You sure do on the wonderfully judgmental FIG.Quote ORIGINAL: larryd3 if it smells like sh1t,looks like sh1t....That makes him sound like an idiot............ Guess he is. you know the rest.[;)] How many of you have a clue what it may be like to try to succeed as a top shelf pro in Philly? You've no clue how tough Philly "fans" can be on sports figures. (If you didn't hear Barkley trying to describe it, during some of the worst broadcasting commentary during a football game; he captured it well.) Is the man not entitled to his perspective of how he's perceived? Very easy for him to draw that conclusion. Who said he was making any excuses for anything? Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: stroh on September 19, 2007, 08:25:11 AM Heard an interesting take on the radio last night.
Long and short of it. Caller: "Yes, (some) black quarterbacks are under increased scrutiny. Not because of their color, but because they we're hyped to us as players that would completely revolutionize the position, and change the way the game is played. Vick, Culpepper, and Young. The increased scrutiny is laid, because none of them has provided the level of sustained performance expected. People expect a Brady, Roethlisberger, or Palmer to be great, or even Just OK. When they aren't, they just had a bad day, or sucked. These 3 we're touted to not only eclipse any of those 'type' guys, but redefine the position itself. When they don't the perception of failure is magnified." Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Aske on September 19, 2007, 09:09:59 AM i guess when the last major champ your city has won was ncaabb about 25 years ago anything sports related can get ya riled up. ;D
Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Zoot on September 19, 2007, 02:37:26 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ???
too bad for him :P ::) :-X Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Aske on September 19, 2007, 03:16:33 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ??? too bad for him :P ::) :-X too bad for which one ? [sm_devil] Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: MFAWG on September 19, 2007, 03:17:38 PM That things 8 pages long, that's unbelieveable.
Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Uisce Beatha on September 19, 2007, 03:20:12 PM That things 8 pages long, that's unbelieveable. Who did Detroit play this week? Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: stroh on September 19, 2007, 03:24:11 PM Who did Detroit play this week? What the *fudge* is that supposed to mean? Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Uisce Beatha on September 19, 2007, 03:26:03 PM Who did Detroit play this week? What the *fudge* is that supposed to mean? You're like a parrot with that today. ;) Stumped ye. Neener, neener, neener. [sm_whistle] Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: E-A-G-L-E! on September 19, 2007, 03:26:10 PM That things 8 pages long, that's unbelieveable. Who did Detroit play this week? They had their "bye", didn't you know? ... or not. Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: stroh on September 19, 2007, 03:38:39 PM You're like a parrot with that today. ;) Have I said that already today? :o Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Uisce Beatha on September 19, 2007, 03:40:57 PM You're like a parrot with that today. ;) Have I said that already today? :o Hell if I know. Someone did. :P Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: gleek on September 19, 2007, 03:43:22 PM You're like a parrot with that today. ;) Have I said that already today? :o Hell if I know. Someone did. :P What the *fudge* is that supposed to mean? Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Zoot on September 19, 2007, 04:10:26 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ??? too bad for him :P ::) :-X too bad for which one ? [sm_devil] for the prof of course :P Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: stroh on September 19, 2007, 04:13:12 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ??? Who don't? I mean he's like a Canadian Troy Peterson. Only shorter. Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Uisce Beatha on September 19, 2007, 04:24:49 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ??? Who don't? I mean he's like a Canadian Troy Peterson. Only shorter. Plus he's awkwardly feminine. Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Zoot on September 19, 2007, 04:31:10 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ??? Who don't? I mean he's like a Canadian Troy Peterson. Only shorter. Plus he's awkwardly feminine. http://troypeterson.mfr.mlxchange.com/ Title: Re: i knew this would get the professor going :-) Post by: Fuzzy on September 19, 2007, 04:32:20 PM professor has a hard-on for spuzz lately. ??? Who don't? I mean he's like a Canadian Troy Peterson. Only shorter. Plus he's awkwardly feminine. http://troypeterson.mfr.mlxchange.com/ He's the guy. pröñ mustache and all. |