|
Title: Nano-Evil Post by: Uisce Beatha on January 16, 2008, 02:32:40 PM http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7190107.stm
Aske rejoices. And before someone tells me I don't know wtf a nano is and I should stfu... :watchingyou: Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Clive on January 16, 2008, 02:36:37 PM All the cool kids have known that carbon nanotubes are the new black.
Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Uisce Beatha on January 16, 2008, 02:38:53 PM In related news, Clive's still very active at his alma mater.
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/517DwH%2BqVgL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20_.jpg) Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Aske on January 16, 2008, 02:47:22 PM the 1st paragraph and accompanying inset graphic made my head hurt they are so wrong.
Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Uisce Beatha on January 16, 2008, 02:49:15 PM the 1st paragraph and accompanying inset graphic made my head hurt they are so wrong. This better? (http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51EqYvtZ2oL._SS400_.jpg) Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Uisce Beatha on January 16, 2008, 02:50:45 PM And before someone tells me I don't know wtf a nano is and I should stfu... :watchingyou: the 1st paragraph and accompanying inset graphic made my head hurt they are so wrong. :bricks: Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Aske on January 16, 2008, 03:05:54 PM And before someone tells me I don't know wtf a nano is and I should stfu... :watchingyou: the 1st paragraph and accompanying inset graphic made my head hurt they are so wrong. :bricks: by beef aint with you man. with the writer of the article. the 'story' is cool. the writing is bad. [sm_devil] Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Uisce Beatha on January 16, 2008, 03:07:00 PM by beef aint with you man. with the writer of the article. the 'story' is cool. the writing is bad. [sm_devil] :) Just messin'. Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: gleek on January 16, 2008, 03:32:08 PM (http://sci-fi.lovetoknow.com/wiki/images/Sci-Fi/a/ab/Mork.jpg)
Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Spanky on January 16, 2008, 03:37:06 PM by beef aint with you man. with the writer of the article. the 'story' is cool. the writing is bad. [sm_devil] I know I'm gonna pay for this one Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: stroh on January 16, 2008, 03:46:43 PM LMAO! Mork.
Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: gleek on January 16, 2008, 03:55:45 PM by beef aint with you man. with the writer of the article. the 'story' is cool. the writing is bad. [sm_devil] I know I'm gonna pay for this one Retreat! To the basement! Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Clive on January 16, 2008, 04:29:18 PM the 1st paragraph and accompanying inset graphic made my head hurt they are so wrong. This better? (http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51EqYvtZ2oL._SS400_.jpg) What are those? Finished. 8)Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: Blader on January 17, 2008, 10:37:31 AM Cool
Now we can go about creating a monolith....... Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: gleek on January 17, 2008, 10:50:26 AM My God, it's full of carbon atoms!
Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: spacey on January 17, 2008, 11:06:39 AM How much blacker could it be? The answer is none. None more black.
Title: Re: Nano-Evil Post by: stroh on January 17, 2008, 11:11:13 AM How much blacker could it be? The answer is none. None more black. Would that be white? |