|
Title: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: Aske on October 29, 2007, 10:03:38 AM http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/video/videopage?videoId=3083220&categoryId=2564308&n8pe6c=2&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab5pos1
Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: Teed on October 29, 2007, 10:09:46 AM No band??? Cal -Stanford still on top.
Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: MFAWG on October 29, 2007, 10:09:53 AM Where was the band?
Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: Uisce Beatha on October 29, 2007, 11:25:25 AM Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: MP on October 29, 2007, 12:41:24 PM lol trinity is teh sucks
Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: MFAWG on October 29, 2007, 12:55:33 PM Well, that was cheery Uisce...
Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: Uisce Beatha on October 29, 2007, 01:50:00 PM Well, that was cheery Uisce... Sorry. Honestly though, you should blame Churchill. Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: stroh on October 29, 2007, 01:55:49 PM How many Aussies are looking at the video, and don't get what's unique about it?
Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: MFAWG on October 29, 2007, 02:02:12 PM Well, that was cheery Uisce... Sorry. Honestly though, you should blame Churchill. Yes, that's true, actually. Churchill believed that the Turks would be easy pickins', and insisted on the Dardenelles over the strenuous objections of the Royal Navy, IIRC. (Threadjack of the year material?) Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: dystopia on October 29, 2007, 03:28:49 PM http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/video/videopage?videoId=3083220&categoryId=2564308&n8pe6c=2&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab5pos1 heh, finally got a chance to watch this. ;D Title: Re: Cal-Stanford surrenders Post by: MFAWG on October 29, 2007, 09:40:44 PM How many Aussies are looking at the video, and don't get what's unique about it? I'm a little stumped here as well... |