GolfHos
 
*
April 05, 2020, 06:03:34 AM
Username: Password: Duration:

its not like scientific research has ever done anything for 'merka

 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: its not like scientific research has ever done anything for 'merka  (Read 1320 times)
0 Members and 1 Lurker/Spider are viewing this topic.
Aske
Lederhosen

Karma: 120
Posts: 31318
Offline Offline


View ProfileIgnore this user
its not like scientific research has ever done anything for 'merka
« on: May 27, 2008, 09:43:20 AM »

http://www.upi.com/NewsTr...uts_us_on_sidelines/2294/

we're #1 2 !
Logged Return to Top

Quote
Russia has invaded a sovereign neighboring state and threatens a democratic government elected by its people. Such an action is unacceptable in the 21st century.
--  Chimpy McFlightsuit, CEO of Bu$hco Industries of 'Merka
stroh
Sleeveless Hoodie
From: Impact Crater Springs, CA

Karma: 155
Posts: 16135
Offline Offline

We're doomed!

View ProfileIgnore this user
Re: its not like scientific research has ever done anything for 'merka
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2008, 09:54:04 AM »

Logged Return to Top
Clive
Full Metal Jacket

Karma: 77
Posts: 4358
Offline Offline


View ProfileIgnore this user
Re: its not like scientific research has ever done anything for 'merka
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2008, 10:48:09 AM »

Quote
There is still consternation among the scientific community over a decision by Congress 15 years ago to cut off funding for the proposed Superconducting Super Collider near Dallas, a decision that continues to have consequences for the nation's scientific competitiveness, the Houston Chronicle reported Sunday.
Funding would have been preserved if only they'd have stuck another "Super" or two in its name.
Logged Return to Top
gleek
Flak Jacket

Karma: 107
Posts: 9484
Offline Offline

E chu ta!

View ProfileIgnore this user
Re: its not like scientific research has ever done anything for 'merka
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2008, 03:43:28 PM »

Quote
The demise of the Superconducting Super Collider project in 1993 came after its costs ballooned from $4.4 billion in 1987 to as much as $12 billion, a situation many scientists blamed on poor management, the Chronicle said. The project was also was victimized by foreign investors who promised funding but never came through.

When you have a $1 trillion war to fund, worthless crap like research science has to take a back seat.
Logged Return to Top

Woman, open the door, don't let it sting. I wanna breathe that fire again.
Pages: [1]   Return to Top
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Posts
[Politics/Religion] Good Job, reaganomics!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/7075698/China-to-lead-world
by Aske

Aske's assessment of private sector vs. gubmint vs. academia
I have about 15 months experience with private sector , in the area of research,
by Aske

LOL. merka = own3d, vol 2: the final death of the dollar 2012 style
Maybe we can standardize all of North 'Merka on the loonie before then.
by gleek

It's official. I'm am one of the top 25
Sorry to say but we performed the productivity calculations and determined we ne
by Blader

 


 
  Powered by SMF | SMF © 2001-2009, Lewis Media

Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM