Larry Craig
Newbie
Karma: 1 Posts: 10
 Offline
 
|
 |
Marriage must be protected!
« on: July 01, 2008, 10:17:56 AM » |
|
Fellow citizens of the greatest nation in the world, The United States of America, I hope you will stand with me and call your Congressman and Senators to support a bill I recently introduced. It has to do with an issue that I feel strongly about and so should you. It is simple and straightforward: Section 1. This article may be cited as the `Marriage Protection Amendment’.
Section 2. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.’.
One of the co-sponsors, my good friend and esteemed colleague David Vitter, feels as strongly as I that the sanctity of this great institution of marriage must be protected. We thank you in advance for help. Have a wonderful 4th of July weekend and I wish you and your non-same sex spouse and families a wonderful weekend. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi...query/z?d110:SJ00043:@@@PP.S. I am so not gay and David Vitter does not have a diaper fetish no matter what some two bit prostitute claims! We love our wives and family and by God we are going to prove it! |
|
|
|
|
Logged 
|
|
|
|
Aske
Poncho
Karma: 93 Posts: 23457
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2008, 10:22:18 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Russia has invaded a sovereign neighboring state and threatens a democratic government elected by its people. Such an action is unacceptable in the 21st century. -- Chimpy McFlightsuit, CEO of Bu$hco Industries of 'Merka |
|
|
Walfredo
Tartan Jacket
Karma: 16 Posts: 1525
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2008, 10:22:38 AM » |
|
I'm so glad people like you are out there fighting to protect my traditional nuclear family from dangers such as the gay agenda, illegal immigrants and Domino's the Noid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It is not advisable, James, to venture unsolicited opinions. You should spare yourself the embarrassing discovery of their exact value to your listener.
Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, 1957
|
|
|
stroh
Halter Top
Karma: 135 Posts: 11656
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2008, 10:26:37 AM » |
|
Hava Nagila!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting in there next to you.
|
|
|
Blader
Tartan Jacket
Karma: 15 Posts: 1039
OfflineSound familiar to you? Google Fregoli Delusion
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2008, 12:14:43 PM » |
|
The co-sponsors read like the invitee list in Rev Ted Haggard's wildest meth-charged sexual fantasy
Sen Allard, Wayne [CO] - 6/25/2008
Sen Brownback, Sam [KS] - 6/25/2008
Sen Craig, Larry E. [ID] - 6/25/2008
Sen Enzi, Michael B. [WY] - 6/26/2008
Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK] - 6/25/2008
Sen Roberts, Pat [KS] - 6/25/2008
Sen Shelby, Richard C. [AL] - 6/25/2008
Sen Thune, John [SD] - 6/25/2008
Sen Vitter, David [LA] - 6/25/2008
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Walfredo
Tartan Jacket
Karma: 16 Posts: 1525
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2008, 12:35:07 PM » |
|
pfft Inhofe is a cock tease.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It is not advisable, James, to venture unsolicited opinions. You should spare yourself the embarrassing discovery of their exact value to your listener.
Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, 1957
|
|
|
Jules
Members Only Jacket From: Australia
Karma: 46 Posts: 3053
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2008, 03:18:49 PM » |
|
Hmmm...................You love your wife, I think I know who you really are Larry.   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The good thing about getting old, is that you can hit the ball out of sight.
|
|
|
Clive
Members Only Jacket
Karma: 69 Posts: 3831
 Online
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2008, 05:32:22 PM » |
|
Hmmm...................You love your wife, I think I know who you really are Larry. Not unless he started writing like Blader. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You may not touch the Master, but you can tickle his creatures.
|
|
|
Uisce Beatha
Dust Jacket From: In the Jar
Karma: 103 Posts: 6619
OfflineAll I need is a pint a day
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2008, 06:09:27 PM » |
|
Are we anti-anti-gay legislation just because of the party affiliation? Or because we're 100% pro-homosexual everything? And we rag mercilessly on them because why?  NTTAWWT |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"If you're darker than a caramel, Reverend Al speaks for you." - Aasif Mandvi
"Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk, I'm a woman's man: no time to talk." - stroh
|
|
|
Fuzzy
Members Only Jacket From: Island of Misfit Toys
Karma: 55 Posts: 3430
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2008, 06:42:36 PM » |
|
Are we anti-anti-gay legislation just because of the party affiliation? Or because we're 100% pro-homosexual everything? And we rag mercilessly on them because why? NTTAWWT Speaking for myself I do find it humorous that Craig and Vitter are co-sponsors of a "marriage protection" bill. And following some news events surrounding this past weekend's GLBT pride parade in Minneapolis I believe both sides could dial it back a few notches. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I found that if you have a goal, that you might not reach it. But if you don't have one, then you are never disappointed. And I gotta tell ya... it feels phenomenal. - Peter LaFleur
"Temperance, like chastity, is its own punishment"
|
|
|
Clive
Members Only Jacket
Karma: 69 Posts: 3831
Online
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2008, 07:18:44 PM » |
|
Are we anti-anti-gay legislation just because of the party affiliation?
Or because we're 100% pro-homosexual everything? I'm anti-anti-gay legislation because I'm pro-anti-discrimination. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You may not touch the Master, but you can tickle his creatures.
|
|
|
spacey
Dust Jacket From: Group W Bench
Karma: 89 Posts: 6980
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2008, 07:34:35 PM » |
|
Anti-meridian. Uncle Meridian. All of the little meridians. Magna Carta. Master charga. Dume procellas. Lotsa vitalles.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you lived here, you'd be home by now.
|
|
|
Uisce Beatha
Dust Jacket From: In the Jar
Karma: 103 Posts: 6619
OfflineAll I need is a pint a day
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2008, 07:39:06 PM » |
|
You guys rock. Why don't 9 of 10 gob*feces*es I run into get it like you do?
stroh's a *humid grotto*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"If you're darker than a caramel, Reverend Al speaks for you." - Aasif Mandvi
"Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk, I'm a woman's man: no time to talk." - stroh
|
|
|
gleek
Rich Corinthian Leather Jacket
Karma: 82 Posts: 5079
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2008, 08:19:45 PM » |
|
It seems that many of the most meaningful amendments after the 10th which also pertain to an individual's rights include language like "shall NOT be denied or abridged". (Obviously, I'm not talking about the 18th.) While many of the other amendments deal with rather inane *feces*, they're necessary because they detail how the government should function.
Having said that, I'm against any kind of amendment whose underlying intention is to "deny or abridge" personal freedoms and impinge upon states' rights. I'm also against littering the Constitution with inane *feces* that has nothing to do with how the government should be run.
If these *fudge*wads want to define what marriage is, they should take it up with Webster's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
stroh = ({})
|
|
|
guy_in_bathroom_stall
Newbie
Karma: 0 Posts: 1
Offline
|
|
Re: Marriage must be protected!
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2008, 08:39:40 PM » |
|
Pssst. Pssssssst. Larry! Are you seeing my signals?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
