GolfHos
 
*
October 23, 2019, 01:23:22 PM
Username: Password: Duration:

Groovy (almost official now)

 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Groovy (almost official now)  (Read 3476 times)
0 Members and 1 Lurker/Spider are viewing this topic.
Uisce Beatha
Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
From: In the Jar

Karma: 116
Posts: 7357
Offline Offline

Get me the tank!

View ProfileIgnore this user
Groovy (almost official now)
« on: July 27, 2007, 06:02:54 PM »

http://uga.org/news/news.cfm?article=2429

(Couldn't find this on the USGA site by the way.  Curious.)

Quote
The proposal calls for two key additional groove specifications for clubs. One would call for groove edge sharpness to be limited to an effective minimum radius of .010 inches. The second would limit the total cross-sectional area of a groove divided by the groove pitch (width plus separation) to 0.0025 square inches per inch.

...

The USGA proposes that these new groove rules become effective for all new clubs covered by this rule change that are manufactured after Jan. 1, 2010. A related Condition of Competition would be added to the USGA Rules of Golf to become effective Jan. 1, 2009.

And of course, an Uisce soap-box opinion.   Wink

It's a bit unclear to me if they're looking to actually change Appendix II or handle this solely through a condition of the competition.  Murky waters.

Quote
“The skill of driving the ball accurately has become much less important in achieving success on Tour than it used to be,” Rugge said. “Our analysis of statistical data measured by the PGA Tour since 1980 shows that historically driving accuracy was as comparably correlated to winning as putting. Beginning in the early 1990s, however, driving accuracy became much less important. Today, the correlation between driving-accuracy rank and money winning rank on the PGA Tour is very low.”

Therefore, the USGA proposes to change the rules governing grooves.

...

They make no bones that they're all about the professional tours.  It's interesting to me that (for the first time maybe?) they're effectively advocating a divergence in the rules - one set for the pros and top amateurs, another for the rest of us.

Quote
The USGA is considering how to treat clubs that currently conform to the Rules of Golf, but would not conform to the proposed new rules. This consideration would be made for the vast majority of golfers who would not likely be affected by the proposed Condition of Competition, as well as for golf clubs already in use and/or manufactured prior to the proposed rule implementation date. The USGA proposes to allow their use for a lengthy period of time (at least 10 years).
« Last Edit: July 27, 2007, 06:07:15 PM by Uisce Beatha » Logged Return to Top

"If you're darker than a caramel, Reverend Al speaks for you." - Aasif Mandvi
"Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk, I'm a woman's man: no time to talk." - stroh
Pages: [1]   Return to Top
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Related Posts
Groovy
I thought Fay's comments were fairly ludicrous, given that they were made a
by GolfHo9

this is getting hilarious
That's like, totally backwards man, groovy bummer. :'(
by TFT

R.I.P. George
Jay's just happy to not be trapped behind the drum kit, so he's lettin
by MFAWG

Well it's almost official...
Interesting to note that 3 of the 4 related posts are from the Official Grievanc
by E-A-G-L-E!

 


 
  Powered by SMF | SMF © 2001-2009, Lewis Media

Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM